Access member only content, take part in discussions with comments on blogs, news and reviews and receive all the latest security industry news directly to your inbox. Join now for free.
Processing registration... Please wait.
This process can take up to a minute to complete.
A confirmation email has been sent to your email address - SUPPLIED EMAIL HERE. Please click on the link in the email to verify your email address. You need to verify your email before you can start posting.
If you do not receive your confirmation email within the next few minutes, it may be because the email has been captured by a junk mail filter. Please ensure you add the domain @scmagazine.com.au to your white-listed senders.
Security software used in public companies has as many application flaws as that used in other large enterprises, research found.
According to a 'State of Software Security Report' from Veracode, released this week, 84 per cent of web applications from public companies were deemed unacceptable when measured against the OWASP Top 10.
The research polled data from 126 public companies over the past 18 months from applications that were submitted to Veracode's cloud-based application security testing platform.
It found that backend operational systems and desktop commercial applications had a 63 per cent failure rate when measured against the CWE/SANS Top 25.
Only 16 per cent of public company web applications passed initial testing, compared with 14 per cent for all others, despite that they generally have greater compliance requirements and usually more funding.
The performance for non-web applications is worse for public companies, with 38 per cent meeting the CWE/SANS industry standard, compared with 42 per cent for all companies.
“Companies can put all of the other cyber security controls in place, but if there are application weaknesses, hackers have the will and time to find and exploit them," Veracode founder Chris Wysopal said.
“The issue simply can not be neglected any more. Over the past year some of the most prominent breaches that were carried out against the most pre-eminent names in business took advantage of weaknesses in software applications to infiltrate traditional perimeter defence security controls.
"This should be a wake-up call. Particularly in public company disclosures, the issue needs to be discussed in much more detail.”
The report also found that only one in five public companies has performed a formal verification on a third-party application.
Veracode EMEA vice-president Matt Peachey said due diligence did not necessarily filter down to improving applications.
“The overall treatment of risk is very poor; we know it is very common stuff, but it is still not there. The time to remediate is less than people think, they are obliged to report it but fixing it is believed to be by hand. The average time to do this is in days, but that is nothing in the software development lifecycle.”
The two most frequently exploited vulnerability types – XSS and SQL injections – showed a statistically flat incidence rate from the first quarter of 2010 to the fourth quarter of 2011, suggesting that new vulnerabilities are being introduced at the same rate as known vulnerabilities are being remediated.
This article originally appeared at scmagazineuk.com
To begin commenting right away, you can log in below or register an account if you don't yet have one. Please read our guidelines on commenting. Offending posts will be removed and your access may be suspended. Abusive or obscene language will not be tolerated. The comments below do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of SC Magazine, Haymarket Media or its employees.
