Latest Comments
"when i login to face book it tells me i am cookies enabled what does this mean"
by celeste | Nov 21, 2008 5:15 PM
 
"Hi this is the mail I received Brett Karpman show details Nov 17 (3 days ago) Reply Atten..."
by Rodney Churchyard | Nov 20, 2008 6:13 PM
 
"security through obscurity...shows how detached HIPAA is from reality."
by priceOfFishInChina | Nov 20, 2008 1:19 PM
 
"Umm. no. The 6.5 product is mounting the offline VM image and performing a scan for patch ..."
by eric | Nov 20, 2008 8:15 AM
 
"it's great i tried it"
by divyacharan | Nov 20, 2008 12:24 AM

Changes to information security regulation in US health industry

  • Email a Friend
  • Print Page
By Illena Armstrong
Mar 19, 2008 1:45 PM
Tags: Changes | to | information | security | regulation | in | US | health | industry |
It was 1996 when Congress passed the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). But even with this long-standing legislation, it seems only recently that organisations started taking notice.

Why? The oft-heard answer was that HIPAA, say it with me now, "had no teeth." While that seems to have held some truth over these many years, it no longer stands.

As SystemExpert's Jon Gossels tells us, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) conducted an audit of Atlanta's Piedmont Hospital. According to many bloggers on the subject, neither the hospital nor HHS confirmed the audit and still few details have emerged. But, some reports indicate that HHS demanded to review the hospital's policies and procedures specifically related to data and systems access, employee violations of security rules, and more.

Meantime, rumors are circulating that HHS has set its sights on a big hospital in California for its second audit concerning possible HIPAA violations. Now, on top of HIPAA, with at least one hospital's security practices having been scrutinised by auditors, there is AB1298. Suddenly, these groups must publicly notify their patients of possible exposures.

What's interesting about these developments is where we've come. There are a ton of people out there saying that if anything is going to compel organisations to implement the right security tools and procedures, regulations will. Naysayers, on the other hand, believe that federal mandates will not necessarily help the numerous data theft incidents experienced today.

But you can't ignore that it is legislative enforcement that has put an industry on high alert. And now, with AB1298, there is even more reason for the health care vertical to come into line — especially given the critical information it traffics everyday.

Undoubtedly, as we enter a recession, budgets are just as short in this space as in any other, but so is the public's patience. And sound business means sound security, as well as keeping your brand and bottom line unharmed.

Illena Armstrong is U.S. editor-in-chief, SC Magazine.

See original article on scmagazineus.com

 
Ads by Google
Thoughts on this article? Add a comment below.
Be the first to comment on this article.

Report this comment as offensive:

   * Indicates information we require to process your submission.

Name: *
Email: *
Reason for offense: *
Your report will not be displayed.  
Name:
*
 
Email:
(will not be displayed)
*
 
Comment:
(HTML not permitted)
*
 
Validation
*

Enter the code you see below:

 

 
 
 
 
 
Tripwire - Click here to win an iTouch
 
 
 
Breaches & Exposures Whitepapers