Living without wires

Is WPA really the answer to the problem of insecure corporate wireless networks? Maybe, but as Rob Buckley discovers, it's not that simple

Almost since its creation, wireless networking has worried CIOs. Unlike Ethernet, wireless networking removes the need for a physical connection to the network, making it far harder to restrict access. Coupled with the flawed WEP protocol used to "secure" initial Wi-Fi networks and it's no surprise that many preferred to ignore wireless networking altogether or fill in the gaps in security with other techniques. To improve the security – and the image – of wireless networking security, the vendors responsible for Wi-Fi developed a replacement for WEP called WPA. But is it as secure as ...
You must be a registered member to access this content.
Please Sign in below or Register now.
NOTE: This Feature is more than 7 days old.
Please login to view the rest of this article

Registered users may log in here.

Login or Register now and get unlimited access.


Why sign up?
  • Unlimited access to SC Magazine content as well as access to to our global resources from SC Magazine US and UK editions.
  • Full use of over 11,000 articles database covering breaking news, video interviews, case studies, research, product reviews and exclusive features with fast and intuitive filtering of results.
  • Personalised "Recommended for you" filters to ensure you have the most relevant content at your finger tips.
  • Daily security bulletin direct to your inbox covering the latest security news from Australia/NZ and around the world.

Register now, its free! We'll never sell your details to third parties and it helps SC Magazine to keep serving you quality stories.
Sign up to receive SC Magazine email newsletters
   FOLLOW US...
Most Read