Access member only content, take part in discussions with comments on blogs, news and reviews and receive all the latest security industry news directly to your inbox. Join now for free.
A confirmation email has been sent to your email address - SUPPLIED EMAIL HERE. Please click on the link in the email to verify your email address. You need to verify your email before you can start posting.
If you do not receive your confirmation email within the next few minutes, it may be because the email has been captured by a junk mail filter. Please ensure you add the domain @scmagazine.com.au to your white-listed senders.
A fifth of email spam now features the domain name of the recipient, according to a new study.
Research by Network Box claimed that this allows spammers to make the spam look genuine, and it is advising all companies not to whitelist their own domain names.
The company claimed that it started to see a wave of spam in December 2008 that mimicked the recipient's email address, or posed as an email from a colleague. These emails included what looked like links to instant messaging services, and an invitation to chat.
Simon Heron, internet security analyst at Network Box, said: “Until late 2008, this was a relatively small problem. But a mimic rate of 20 per cent, that we're seeing now, is very high. We advise companies who use whitelisting to take their own domain names off the list and consider other ways of avoiding false positives.”
Network Box said that one of the solutions to this problem is to use Sender Policy Framework, which uses a field in the DNS record to define all the IP addresses that an email from a legitimate sender will come from.See original article on scmagazineus.com
To begin commenting right away, you can log in below or register an account if you don't yet have one. Please read our guidelines on commenting. Offending posts will be removed and your access may be suspended. Abusive or obscene language will not be tolerated. The comments below do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of SC Magazine, Haymarket Media or its employees.