Access member only content, take part in discussions with comments on blogs, news and reviews and receive all the latest security industry news directly to your inbox. Join now for free.
A confirmation email has been sent to your email address - SUPPLIED EMAIL HERE. Please click on the link in the email to verify your email address. You need to verify your email before you can start posting.
If you do not receive your confirmation email within the next few minutes, it may be because the email has been captured by a junk mail filter. Please ensure you add the domain @scmagazine.com.au to your white-listed senders.
Half of all mobile phone manufacturers reported malware infections, voice or text spam attacks and other security incidents last year, according to research by McAfee.
The firm's Mobile Security Report 2009 (PDF) found that 70 per cent of manufacturers think that mobile security is critical to their future, and highlight device protection as an important step.
"Attempts to make the mobile ecosystem more open have shown early signs of success, yet attacks on mobile networks and devices continue to grow in complexity and sophistication," said Victor Kouznetsov, senior vice president of McAfee Mobile Security.
"Hence it is encouraging to see that mobile manufacturers are looking to regain control in providing security functionality to safeguard their users."
Nearly half of mobile manufacturers said that the cost of patching and fixing affected devices had significantly affected their business, the report found.
In addition, 81 per cent of manufacturers are worried about mobile payments, 69 per cent are not convinced by the safety of installing applications, and 66 per cent are concerned about Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity, according to the research.
To begin commenting right away, you can log in below or register an account if you don't yet have one. Please read our guidelines on commenting. Offending posts will be removed and your access may be suspended. Abusive or obscene language will not be tolerated. The comments below do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of SC Magazine, Haymarket Media or its employees.