Access member only content, take part in discussions with comments on blogs, news and reviews and receive all the latest security industry news directly to your inbox. Join now for free.
A confirmation email has been sent to your email address - SUPPLIED EMAIL HERE. Please click on the link in the email to verify your email address. You need to verify your email before you can start posting.
If you do not receive your confirmation email within the next few minutes, it may be because the email has been captured by a junk mail filter. Please ensure you add the domain @scmagazine.com.au to your white-listed senders.
Facebook today announced a major shift in the way it runs its social networking site.
The company caused a storm of protest earlier in the month when it attempted to amend its terms and conditions and was forced into an embarrassing back-down as a result.
In an effort to avoid a repetition of this, Facebook today announced that it was devising a new way of running the site. It has published two documents, “Facebook Principles" and a separate "Statement of Rights and Responsibilities” and has asked for user feedback.
Facebook Principles covers the rights of individual users of the site, and will act as a framework for future changes. The ten principles contain commitments that users own their own information, that they have a right to decide with whom to share it and that future decisions about the site are subject to a Town Hall style of democratic discussion.
The Statement of Rights and Responsibilities will eventually replace the terms of use the company hopes. These principles include the view that information on the site is not going to be available forever but can be deleted by the user, that new rules should have input from users and that the rules should be clearly understandable.
“I believe these steps are unprecedented in promoting understanding and enabling participation on the web. I hope you will take a look at these documents, read them carefully, and share your thoughts,” said Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg in a blog posting.
“History tells us that systems are most fairly governed when there is an open and transparent dialogue between the people who make decisions and those who are affected by them. We believe history will one day show that this principle holds true for companies as well, and we're looking to moving in this direction with you.”
Users are invited to comment on the proposed changes and have until the 29th of March to do so. If further changes are deemed to contentious they can be put to a vote and that will be binding if more than 30 per cent of the total user base casts a ballot.
“If Facebook manages to pull this off, to build a healthy and vibrant governance relationship with users, then it will prove to be a source of competitive advantage that goes beyond the “network effect,” said Gartner analyst Ray Valdes.
“On the other hand, if Facebook raises expectations to unrealistic levels and users find that their interests don’t align with those of FB (it is after all a private business, not a province or state), then there can be big trouble ahead.”
“I think that this challenge is not unique to Facebook. They just happen to be at the front of the pack in approaching this phenomenon. Over time, other consumer sites will have to rethink their user engagement strategy, and think less like an electric utility and more like a village, province or state.”
To begin commenting right away, you can log in below or register an account if you don't yet have one. Please read our guidelines on commenting. Offending posts will be removed and your access may be suspended. Abusive or obscene language will not be tolerated. The comments below do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of SC Magazine, Haymarket Media or its employees.