Access member only content, take part in discussions with comments on blogs, news and reviews and receive all the latest security industry news directly to your inbox. Join now for free.
A confirmation email has been sent to your email address - SUPPLIED EMAIL HERE. Please click on the link in the email to verify your email address. You need to verify your email before you can start posting.
If you do not receive your confirmation email within the next few minutes, it may be because the email has been captured by a junk mail filter. Please ensure you add the domain @scmagazine.com.au to your white-listed senders.
In an effort to quiet speculation within the security community, Visa has issued a statement denying that a new payment processor breach has occurred."The recent alerts Visa sent to card issuers were part of an existing investigation and are not related to a new compromise event," said the statement, issued late last week.The development may clear up some confusion among banker associations, credit unions and industry observers, many of whom believed that another breach -- separate from the recently disclosed Heartland Payment Systems and RBS WorldPay -- had occurred. A number of groups such as the Community Bankers Association of Illinois published alerts to members, implying that the breach was new.Visa, however, did not say which processor was responsible for the investigation or how many records were compromised. "Visa has provided the affected accounts to financial institutions so they can take steps to protect customers," the statement said. "In addition, Visa is risk-scoring all transactions in real-time, helping card issuers better distinguish fraud transactions from legitimate ones." See original article on scmagazineus.com
To begin commenting right away, you can log in below or register an account if you don't yet have one. Please read our guidelines on commenting. Offending posts will be removed and your access may be suspended. Abusive or obscene language will not be tolerated. The comments below do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of SC Magazine, Haymarket Media or its employees.