Access member only content, take part in discussions with comments on blogs, news and reviews and receive all the latest security industry news directly to your inbox. Join now for free.
A confirmation email has been sent to your email address - SUPPLIED EMAIL HERE. Please click on the link in the email to verify your email address. You need to verify your email before you can start posting.
If you do not receive your confirmation email within the next few minutes, it may be because the email has been captured by a junk mail filter. Please ensure you add the domain @scmagazine.com.au to your white-listed senders.
The Danish company said that data from its free Personal Software Inspector (PSI) tool showed that there were far more unpatched applications than operating systems among users. Furthermore application patches were left open to abuse for far longer than operating system patches.“The criminals are developing more and more targeted attacks, focusing on the applications that are most likely to be unpatched,” said Secunia chief technical officer, Thomas Kristensen.“Unfortunately another trend is also quite evident; private user don't patch! I think that many users are not aware of the problem with unpatched programs and the software companies don't inform sufficiently about the importance of updating and neither do they provide sufficient updating mechanisms.”The figures were backed up by data in Microsoft’s last Security Intelligence Report, earlier this month, which found that 90 per cent of serious vulnerabilities were not found in Windows, but in third party applications.“I would not hesitate to say that the biggest threat to your PC probably is a program you installed yourself, simply because it is out of date and insecure,” Kristensen continued.
To begin commenting right away, you can log in below or register an account if you don't yet have one. Please read our guidelines on commenting. Offending posts will be removed and your access may be suspended. Abusive or obscene language will not be tolerated. The comments below do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of SC Magazine, Haymarket Media or its employees.