Access member only content, take part in discussions with comments on blogs, news and reviews and receive all the latest security industry news directly to your inbox. Join now for free.
A confirmation email has been sent to your email address - SUPPLIED EMAIL HERE. Please click on the link in the email to verify your email address. You need to verify your email before you can start posting.
If you do not receive your confirmation email within the next few minutes, it may be because the email has been captured by a junk mail filter. Please ensure you add the domain @scmagazine.com.au to your white-listed senders.
Speaking to the Daily Mail, Vincent Weafer, vice president of Symantec Security Response, claimed that Conficker is slowly being activated as a method to quietly turn thousands of computers into servers of email spam and spyware hosts.
Weafer said: “Expect this to be long-term, slowly changing. It's not going to be fast, aggressive.” He also claimed that it will download the Waledac virus to recruit the PCs into a second botnet that is used to distribute email spam.
Paul Ferguson, senior researcher with Trend Micro, claimed that the authors of Conficker are likely to have installed a spam engine and another malicious software program on tens of thousands of computers since April 7.
Jason Miller, Shavlik's security and data team manager, previously claimed that Conficker.E has a kill date of May 3 and will cease to be functional from that date, although it is possible that it could be taken over by another botnet controller. Meanwhile, Shawn Henry, assistant director of the FBI's cyber division, claimed at the RSA conference in San Francisco that the rumoured Conficker attack may have led to public distraction over legitimate cyber threats. He told PC World magazine: “There are dozens of Conficker-like threats and vulnerabilities out there, while the media stories helped to raise awareness, I think that focusing people on that particular aspect, perhaps took away their attention from the overall threat, which is just as great or greater than Conficker itself. “I don't want the public to think that there's this one threat and we didn't really see anything so we're safe.” See original article on scmagazineuk.com
Meanwhile, Shawn Henry, assistant director of the FBI's cyber division, claimed at the RSA conference in San Francisco that the rumoured Conficker attack may have led to public distraction over legitimate cyber threats.
He told PC World magazine: “There are dozens of Conficker-like threats and vulnerabilities out there, while the media stories helped to raise awareness, I think that focusing people on that particular aspect, perhaps took away their attention from the overall threat, which is just as great or greater than Conficker itself.
“I don't want the public to think that there's this one threat and we didn't really see anything so we're safe.”
To begin commenting right away, you can log in below or register an account if you don't yet have one. Please read our guidelines on commenting. Offending posts will be removed and your access may be suspended. Abusive or obscene language will not be tolerated. The comments below do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of SC Magazine, Haymarket Media or its employees.