Access member only content, take part in discussions with comments on blogs, news and reviews and receive all the latest security industry news directly to your inbox. Join now for free.
A confirmation email has been sent to your email address - SUPPLIED EMAIL HERE. Please click on the link in the email to verify your email address. You need to verify your email before you can start posting.
If you do not receive your confirmation email within the next few minutes, it may be because the email has been captured by a junk mail filter. Please ensure you add the domain @scmagazine.com.au to your white-listed senders.
Iarla Flynn, a member of the policy team at Google Australia, has raised concerns with the Federal Government's plans to introduce a mandatory filtering regime for ISPs.
"Our primary concern is that the scope of content to be filtered is too wide," said Flynn, in a blog posting. "While we recognise that protecting the free exchange of ideas and information cannot be without some limits, we believe that more information generally means more choice, more freedom and ultimately more power for the individual."Flynn agreed that child pornography was "obvious" material to block, but said moving to a mandatory ISP filtering regime with a scope that went "well beyond such material" was "heavy handed" and could raise "genuine questions about restrictions on access to information"
Referred to in the posting was a report released Wednesday by Professors Catharine Lumby, Lelia Green and John Hartley entitled Untangling The Net: The Scope of Content Caught By Mandatory Internet Filtering.
The report found that a wide scope of content could be prohibited under the proposed filtering regime, Flynn said.
"Refused Classification (or RC) is a broad category of content that includes not just child sexual abuse material but also socially and politically controversial material -- for example, educational content on safer drug use -- as well as the grey realms of material instructing in any crime, including politically controversial crimes such as euthanasia.
"This type of content may be unpleasant and unpalatable but we believe that government should not have the right to block information which can inform debate of controversial issues."
"We should all retain focus on making the Internet safer for people of all ages.
"Our view is that online safety should focus on user education, user empowerment through technology tools ... and cooperation between law enforcement and industry partners."
According to What the hashtag, there have been over 15,986 public Twitter messages from 5,558 contributors using the #nocleanfeed hashtag since yesterday.
To begin commenting right away, you can log in below or register an account if you don't yet have one. Please read our guidelines on commenting. Offending posts will be removed and your access may be suspended. Abusive or obscene language will not be tolerated. The comments below do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of SC Magazine, Haymarket Media or its employees.