Access member only content, take part in discussions with comments on blogs, news and reviews and receive all the latest security industry news directly to your inbox. Join now for free.
A confirmation email has been sent to your email address - SUPPLIED EMAIL HERE. Please click on the link in the email to verify your email address. You need to verify your email before you can start posting.
If you do not receive your confirmation email within the next few minutes, it may be because the email has been captured by a junk mail filter. Please ensure you add the domain @scmagazine.com.au to your white-listed senders.
The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) spent just over $400,000 in 2008-9 to investigate complaints against internet content and take action on prohibited content hosted overseas.
The figure was revealed in a yet-to-be-published answer to a question on notice from Greens Party Senator Scott Ludlam.
Ludlam had requested the ACMA reveal the total amount it had budgeted for internet content regulation - specifically the maintenance of the ACMA blacklist - at a Senate Estimates hearing last year.
ACMA responded this week with a figure of $424,000 for the period 2008-9. A table of previous year's costs was also included [see below].
The figures were understood to be a proportional estimate of the total budget committed to the administrative unit within ACMA that was responsible for online content complaint handling.
ACMA's budget was expected to increase once the Federal Government introduced mandatory ISP-level filtering of refused classification material.
A web page on the Department of Broadband web site stated the Federal Government will assist the ACMA by giving it additional funding to "enhance the security of the RC Content list" (a portion of the ACMA blacklist) and "automate its distribution" so that ISPs did not have to use manual methods for updating the list.
0.304
0.442
0.424
1.411
To begin commenting right away, you can log in below or register an account if you don't yet have one. Please read our guidelines on commenting. Offending posts will be removed and your access may be suspended. Abusive or obscene language will not be tolerated. The comments below do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of SC Magazine, Haymarket Media or its employees.