Access member only content, take part in discussions with comments on blogs, news and reviews and receive all the latest security industry news directly to your inbox. Join now for free.
A confirmation email has been sent to your email address - SUPPLIED EMAIL HERE. Please click on the link in the email to verify your email address. You need to verify your email before you can start posting.
If you do not receive your confirmation email within the next few minutes, it may be because the email has been captured by a junk mail filter. Please ensure you add the domain @scmagazine.com.au to your white-listed senders.
Apple's security team kicked off the year yesterday with an update to fix 12 vulnerabilities in the firm's Snow Leopard and Leopard operating systems, including seven Adobe Flash Player flaws.The relatively small patch will come as a relief to security administrators, who faced a record Apple security update last November which addressed nearly 60 vulnerabilities.Contained in the security advisory this time are warnings of multiple flaws in the Adobe Flash Player plug-in, the most serious of which "may lead to arbitrary code execution when viewing a maliciously crafted web site". This flaw could enable a hacker to take control of a compromised PC.Also featured was a fix for a man-in-the-middle vulnerability in the SSL and TLS protocols. "An attacker with a privileged network position may capture data or change the operations performed in sessions protected by SSL," read the advisory.Nine of the 12 flaws may lead to "arbitrary code execution", according to Apple. Although the company does not categorise the severity of its vulnerabilities, unlike Oracle for example, this kind of flaw is likely to be regarded as 'critical' by security administrators.
To begin commenting right away, you can log in below or register an account if you don't yet have one. Please read our guidelines on commenting. Offending posts will be removed and your access may be suspended. Abusive or obscene language will not be tolerated. The comments below do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of SC Magazine, Haymarket Media or its employees.