Access member only content, take part in discussions with comments on blogs, news and reviews and receive all the latest security industry news directly to your inbox. Join now for free.
Processing registration... Please wait.
This process can take up to a minute to complete.
A confirmation email has been sent to your email address - SUPPLIED EMAIL HERE. Please click on the link in the email to verify your email address. You need to verify your email before you can start posting.
If you do not receive your confirmation email within the next few minutes, it may be because the email has been captured by a junk mail filter. Please ensure you add the domain @scmagazine.com.au to your white-listed senders.
The Federal Government’s planned introduction of mandatory internet filtering was unlikely to change the way most broadband users voted in the next election.The results of the 2009 Whirlpool survey, released overnight, showed 44.1 percent of the 23,683 respondents believed filtering would be a “key factor” affecting their vote.Almost 40 percent percent of respondents indicated the introduction of filtering would “possibly” affect the way they voted but “not at the expense of other issues” while 13.3 percent said it would not change their vote.The results appeared to the show the issue was a divisive rather than decisive one for Labor at the next election.The survey showed some - but not all - of the Government’s messages around the need for filtering were getting through.In particular, respondents believed it could restrict access to child pornography and “protect children from harm”.The news wasn’t all good. Almost one in three respondents indicated they were still “unsure what sites might be filtered” under the proposal, draft laws for which were due out within months.“The fact that almost 30 percent of respondents did not understand exactly what will be blocked is a testament to the vague and ever changing policy statements made by the Government,” Whirlpool said.Most respondents also believed they - or someone close to them - could circumvent the filters. Over 80 percent either knew of one or more ways or were confident they could skirt the filters “given instructions”.iiNet was rightThe survey also supported a number of assertions made by ISP iiNet in its copyright case against the film industry.iiNet had argued that copyright infringement notices it received from studios included only IP addresses that identified a device - rather than a user - that was connected to the internet.The user could be "be the partner, child, flat-mate, employee or customer of the account holder" or even a stranger passing an account holder's unsecured wireless network.The results of the 2009 Whirlpool survey appeared supportive of that assertion.Most broadband connections (41 percent) were frequently used by two people. Over 45 percent of connections had three or more regular users.Likewise only 10 percent of connections serviced only one computer. Over 40 percent of connections serviced four or more computers.Almost three out of every four respondents also indicated they shared their connection via wired and wireless networks.Arguments made in court on the benefits of supplying legal content also appeared well-founded.When asked what broadband users liked about their current ISP, 56.2 percent of iiNet users said they liked the “unmetered content”. Over 12 percent also said they liked the “music and videos” iiNet provided.Rich media content was not among the top five reasons why respondents indicated they had broadband. “Fast web surfing” was number one. “Watching downloaded TV shows” was cited by 53.2 percent of respondents and “P2P file sharing” by 47.9 percent.
To begin commenting right away, you can log in below or register an account if you don't yet have one. Please read our guidelines on commenting. Offending posts will be removed and your access may be suspended. Abusive or obscene language will not be tolerated. The comments below do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of SC Magazine, Haymarket Media or its employees.