Access member only content, take part in discussions with comments on blogs, news and reviews and receive all the latest security industry news directly to your inbox. Join now for free.
A confirmation email has been sent to your email address - SUPPLIED EMAIL HERE. Please click on the link in the email to verify your email address. You need to verify your email before you can start posting.
If you do not receive your confirmation email within the next few minutes, it may be because the email has been captured by a junk mail filter. Please ensure you add the domain @scmagazine.com.au to your white-listed senders.
Attorneys representing accused hacker Gary McKinnon are asking the U.K.'s new home secretary to reconsider the planned extradition of their client.McKinnon, 43, is scheduled to be extradited to the United States to face charges of hacking into 97 computers operated by the US government, including those of the Pentagon, US Army, Air Force and NASA. American authorities have said his actions resulted in a shutdown of the Army's Military District of Washington network, containing more than 2,000 computers and resulting in US$700,000 in damage.But Kaim Todner, the law firm representing McKinnon, said it has "submitted representations to the new Home Secretary Theresa May" asking her to let McKinnon stand trial in his home country, not in the United States, where he faces up to 60 years in prison if convicted. McKinnon has maintained that he is simply a "computer geek" and only wanted to find evidence of alien life and UFOs. His lawyers said an extradition would lead to "disastrous consequences" for his health, including possible psychosis and suicide, according to reports. They have claimed McKinnon is in an “extremely fragile mental state.” But the odds seem stacked against him.Last year, former Home Secretary Alan Johnson said that, after reviewing medical reports and court filings for McKinnon, who suffers from Asperger's Syndrome, he found no evidence of why McKinnon should avoid extradition.McKinnon is now taking his case to the High Court, where a judge soon is set to rule on whether Johnson was correct in his decision.See original article on scmagazineus.com
To begin commenting right away, you can log in below or register an account if you don't yet have one. Please read our guidelines on commenting. Offending posts will be removed and your access may be suspended. Abusive or obscene language will not be tolerated. The comments below do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of SC Magazine, Haymarket Media or its employees.