Access member only content, take part in discussions with comments on blogs, news and reviews and receive all the latest security industry news directly to your inbox. Join now for free.
Processing registration... Please wait.
This process can take up to a minute to complete.
A confirmation email has been sent to your email address - SUPPLIED EMAIL HERE. Please click on the link in the email to verify your email address. You need to verify your email before you can start posting.
If you do not receive your confirmation email within the next few minutes, it may be because the email has been captured by a junk mail filter. Please ensure you add the domain @scmagazine.com.au to your white-listed senders.
The US is home to the greatest arsenal of botnets, according to reports from Microsoft and Sophos.
According to Sophos, US computers dumped 18.6 per cent of the world’s spam between July and September this year.
When the whole continent was taken into account, North America only came third behind Asia. It was Europe that topped this list as the source of a third of the world’s spam.
It was not surprising, therefore, that Microsoft’s study of the botnet population also placed the US as the main culprit. During the second quarter of this year, over two million computers were hosting bots. Even Brazil, in second place, only had half a million infections.
The most prevalent botnets – Rimecud, Alureon and Hamweq – all showed a decline between the two quarters but fourth-placed Pushbot bucked the trend. This bot spreads through instant messaging applications such as MSN Messenger, Yahoo Messenger and AIM. Infections showed a 24 per cent increase showing botnets are set to be with us for some time.
This article originally appeared at itpro.co.uk
To begin commenting right away, you can log in below or register an account if you don't yet have one. Please read our guidelines on commenting. Offending posts will be removed and your access may be suspended. Abusive or obscene language will not be tolerated. The comments below do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of SC Magazine, Haymarket Media or its employees.