Access member only content, take part in discussions with comments on blogs, news and reviews and receive all the latest security industry news directly to your inbox. Join now for free.
A confirmation email has been sent to your email address - SUPPLIED EMAIL HERE. Please click on the link in the email to verify your email address. You need to verify your email before you can start posting.
If you do not receive your confirmation email within the next few minutes, it may be because the email has been captured by a junk mail filter. Please ensure you add the domain @scmagazine.com.au to your white-listed senders.
The Senate has passed a bill that would allow Australia’s spy agency, ASIO, to intercept communications on behalf of Federal, State and Territory law enforcement agencies.
The Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment Act 2010 was re-introduced by the Attorney-General in the House of Representatives on 30 September, after the 2010 Federal Election.
It sought to facilitate cooperation between ASIO, the Australian Secret Intelligence Service, the Defence Signals Directorate and the Defence Imagery and Geospatial Organisation.
Under the proposed amendments, ASIO would be able to share its information with other intelligence agencies and the broader national security community.
Law enforcement agencies would receive additional powers to access and use data such as call records to assist in finding missing persons.
Carriers and service providers would also be required to inform the Government of any proposed technological changes that may affect its interceptive capabilities.
The bill was passed by the House of Representatives last October and by the Senate this morning, despite fierce opposition from the Australian Greens.
Highlighting “grave concerns” raised by the Law Council of Australia and Australian Privacy Foundation in a 2010 Senate Inquiry (pdf), Greens Senator Scott Ludlam said the bill gave ASIO “too much power”.
“ASIO will be able to be brought in by any other agency to investigate virtually anything at all,” he stated. “The Law Council warned that ASIO ‘should not be regarded as a mercenary force available on request’.”
The Greens had proposed that the Act be amended to require ASIO to report the number of requests for assistance it received annually, the names of agencies making the requests, and the purpose for which each request was made.
However, that proposal was rejected in a vote of 33 to five today.
“ASIO argues that secrecy is necessary for the kind of work that it does,” Ludlam said. “It is for that reason that we do not want to expand the mandate of ASIO into areas like tax law or welfare law.”
To begin commenting right away, you can log in below or register an account if you don't yet have one. Please read our guidelines on commenting. Offending posts will be removed and your access may be suspended. Abusive or obscene language will not be tolerated. The comments below do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of SC Magazine, Haymarket Media or its employees.