Access member only content, take part in discussions with comments on blogs, news and reviews and receive all the latest security industry news directly to your inbox. Join now for free.
Processing registration... Please wait.
This process can take up to a minute to complete.
A confirmation email has been sent to your email address - SUPPLIED EMAIL HERE. Please click on the link in the email to verify your email address. You need to verify your email before you can start posting.
If you do not receive your confirmation email within the next few minutes, it may be because the email has been captured by a junk mail filter. Please ensure you add the domain @scmagazine.com.au to your white-listed senders.
The three-year struggle between BlackBerry manufacturer Research In Motion and the Indian Government over what can remain private continues to be played out in public.
After months of debate over India's demands for RIM to provide access to its proprietary enterprise services and encrypted emails, Research in Motion linked the dispute to India's economic outlook.
In a note to its enterprise customers in late February, the smartphone maker wrote that a ban on its operations would affect India's financial development and its outsourcing opportunities. Noting that other companies – including Nokia, Motorola, Apple, Sony Ericsson and HTC – offer wireless services with similar types of encryption technologies, RIM contended that every supplier should abide by the same rules.
India responded a week later by sharing an internal telecommunications department document with The Economic Times. It said that, although Research in Motion had recently provided encryption keys for its messaging and internet services to Indian security officials, the company had not provided enough technical detail to permit sufficient access.
The Government repeated its position that Research in Motion set up an enterprise server in India, something it said the company was considering. The internal document said that a technical committee was established to study the architecture of other service providers' networks, but did not commit to applying the same scrutiny to all mobile carriers.
In January, Research in Motion suspended its discussions with the Indian Government, contending that officials in the country were leaking sensitive information to the media to undermine the Canadian company's position.
The Department of Telecommunications dismissed that charge as a delaying tactic on the Candian company's part.
This article originally appeared at scmagazineus.com
To begin commenting right away, you can log in below or register an account if you don't yet have one. Please read our guidelines on commenting. Offending posts will be removed and your access may be suspended. Abusive or obscene language will not be tolerated. The comments below do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of SC Magazine, Haymarket Media or its employees.