Access member only content, take part in discussions with comments on blogs, news and reviews and receive all the latest security industry news directly to your inbox. Join now for free.
A confirmation email has been sent to your email address - SUPPLIED EMAIL HERE. Please click on the link in the email to verify your email address. You need to verify your email before you can start posting.
If you do not receive your confirmation email within the next few minutes, it may be because the email has been captured by a junk mail filter. Please ensure you add the domain @scmagazine.com.au to your white-listed senders.
Twitter has been barred from overstating the extent to which it can securely manage user information for the next 20 years in a settlement with the US Federal Trade Commission.
The micro blogging site had been investigated over two hacking incidents in 2009 in which 55 accounts were hijacked, including US President Barack Obama’s.
The accounts were hijacked after someone hacked into Twitter’s support team administration tools, the company admitted after the incidents occurred.
The FTC alleged the attacks exposed non-public information and information that users had designated as private, such as private Tweets.
The regulator took exception to the wording of Twitter’s security claims in its original privacy policy, which said it employed “administrative, physical and electronic measures designed to protect your information from unauthorised access”.
Twitter's subsequent versions, which can be found here, make no claims about the level of security it provides.
The FTC also ordered Twitter to establish and maintain a “comprehensive information security program”, which would be assessed biannually by an independent auditor for the next decade.
To begin commenting right away, you can log in below or register an account if you don't yet have one. Please read our guidelines on commenting. Offending posts will be removed and your access may be suspended. Abusive or obscene language will not be tolerated. The comments below do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of SC Magazine, Haymarket Media or its employees.