Access member only content, take part in discussions with comments on blogs, news and reviews and receive all the latest security industry news directly to your inbox. Join now for free.
A confirmation email has been sent to your email address - SUPPLIED EMAIL HERE. Please click on the link in the email to verify your email address. You need to verify your email before you can start posting.
If you do not receive your confirmation email within the next few minutes, it may be because the email has been captured by a junk mail filter. Please ensure you add the domain @scmagazine.com.au to your white-listed senders.
Victoria's Auditor-General has blamed a lack of integration between the state's legal IT systems for difficulties gauging the success of programs to cut re-offence rates and tracking defendents through the system.
The state's court database, Courtlink, the Victorian Police database and Corrections Victoria databases were designed in isolation to suit individual operations, the Auditor-General Des Pearson noted.
“Currently, there is no way to track defendants through the criminal justice system," Pearson's report stated.
Resolving the issue was said to be complex and challenging. The state's Department of Justice had been working toward a single integrated technology platform and a set of applications for all Victorian courts and tribunals.
But implementation of the data management system had been delayed and the system was not yet operational in courts.
Rollout of the new integrated system to all courts was scheduled to occur by February next year.
The Auditor-General noted that the current system of "stovepipe" databases had made its own role difficult in producing assessments of Victoria’s Neighbourhood Justice Centres (NJC) and the Court Integrated Services Program (CISP).
The two programs, which targeted reductions in re-offending rates, had cost the Victorian Government $78 million as at the 2009-10 financial year.
While noting promising results from the programs were emerging, the Auditor-General said that weak database design and management meant the programs could not be judged an unqualified success.
Pearson noted that parts of his audit required data in the CISP sample to be manually matched with the records in Courtlink or the databases of Corrections Victoria.
"This matching exercise was resource intensive and time consuming," the audit stated.
The Auditor-General also recommended that the Department of Justice and the Magistrates’ Court give priority to the use of unique identifiers for tracking defendants’ contact within the criminal justice system.
To begin commenting right away, you can log in below or register an account if you don't yet have one. Please read our guidelines on commenting. Offending posts will be removed and your access may be suspended. Abusive or obscene language will not be tolerated. The comments below do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of SC Magazine, Haymarket Media or its employees.