Access member only content, take part in discussions with comments on blogs, news and reviews and receive all the latest security industry news directly to your inbox. Join now for free.
Processing registration... Please wait.
This process can take up to a minute to complete.
A confirmation email has been sent to your email address - SUPPLIED EMAIL HERE. Please click on the link in the email to verify your email address. You need to verify your email before you can start posting.
If you do not receive your confirmation email within the next few minutes, it may be because the email has been captured by a junk mail filter. Please ensure you add the domain @scmagazine.com.au to your white-listed senders.
A leading Oxford academic has challenged the notion of the "wild west" web arguing it could do with loosening up.
In June, director of the Oxford Internet Institute, William Dutton, will release a report showing the effects of the web on freedom of expression.
"Often the internet is viewed as the wild west, where there's no regulation," Professor Dutton said at a World Wide Web Consortium conference in Oxford.
"One of the themes of our research project was to point out how regulated the internet is in all sorts of ways."
He noted that such laws aren't necessarily negative; users are often regulated for good reasons, to prevent fraud, defamation or child abuse.
But Dutton said that much legislation is based on old-fashioned ideas. "More and more politicians are applying legislation that is coming from dated models - from broadcasting, from the telephone era," he argued.
"We need a model that is appropriate and fitting to the internet and the web, and not something that comes from an earlier era. The internet is not broadcasting, but people wish it were so they could just regulate the ISPs and have them decide what's fit for broadcasting."
He highlighted the disconnection plans of Britain's Digital Economy Act, and slammed plans to force ISPs into "surveillance and watching what others are downloading".
Dutton's research found a global trend in increased web filtering for political, moral or commercial reasons.
"That's a worrisome trend that counters some of the really dramatic improvements made by the web itself."
Because governments are increasingly using the web for surveillance, the ability to stay anonymous is increasingly important, he said.
"It's so obvious in Middle East and North Africa that the most obvious strategy for some countries is to identify those using the internet for protests," he said, noting the number of bloggers arrested has never been higher, and has a "chilling effect" by discouraging others from speaking out.
"We cannot assume freedom of expression is an inevitable outcome of technology advances," he added.
This article originally appeared at pcpro.co.uk
To begin commenting right away, you can log in below or register an account if you don't yet have one. Please read our guidelines on commenting. Offending posts will be removed and your access may be suspended. Abusive or obscene language will not be tolerated. The comments below do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of SC Magazine, Haymarket Media or its employees.