Access member only content, take part in discussions with comments on blogs, news and reviews and receive all the latest security industry news directly to your inbox. Join now for free.
Processing registration... Please wait.
This process can take up to a minute to complete.
A confirmation email has been sent to your email address - SUPPLIED EMAIL HERE. Please click on the link in the email to verify your email address. You need to verify your email before you can start posting.
If you do not receive your confirmation email within the next few minutes, it may be because the email has been captured by a junk mail filter. Please ensure you add the domain @scmagazine.com.au to your white-listed senders.
Sony's US chief Howard Stringer has blamed forensic tests for a week-long delay in notifying 77 million customers of the PlayStation Network data breach.
Stringer acknowledged customers were unhappy with the notification process in a letter published online today.
“I know some believe we should have notified our customers earlier than we did. It’s a fair question,” Stronger said.
“I wish we could have gotten the answers we needed sooner, but forensic analysis is a complex, time-consuming process.
"Hackers, after all, do their best to cover their tracks, and it took some time for our experts to find those tracks and begin to identify what personal information had — or had not — been taken.”
Sony said it was in the final stages of bringing the disabled PlayStation Network and Qriocity services back online.
By comparison, security company LastPass took less than a day to notify thousands of users of a potential data breach and announce plans to fast-track network security improvements.
Copyright © SC Magazine, Australia
To begin commenting right away, you can log in below or register an account if you don't yet have one. Please read our guidelines on commenting. Offending posts will be removed and your access may be suspended. Abusive or obscene language will not be tolerated. The comments below do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of SC Magazine, Haymarket Media or its employees.