Access member only content, take part in discussions with comments on blogs, news and reviews and receive all the latest security industry news directly to your inbox. Join now for free.
Processing registration... Please wait.
This process can take up to a minute to complete.
A confirmation email has been sent to your email address - SUPPLIED EMAIL HERE. Please click on the link in the email to verify your email address. You need to verify your email before you can start posting.
If you do not receive your confirmation email within the next few minutes, it may be because the email has been captured by a junk mail filter. Please ensure you add the domain @scmagazine.com.au to your white-listed senders.
Researchers have revealed a new type of spam campaign that appears to be a test run to find out how mobile users will respond to social engineering attempts on their smart phones and tablets.
The spam emails had hawked male enhancement drugs but were different in that they contained a link to a legitimate site -- 2tag.nl -- that generated quick response (QR) codes for URLs.
The link leads to an already-created QR code, which can be scanned by a mobile reader application.
After the code is recognised, a URL is loaded that advertised the counterfeit goods, including Viagra and Cialis.
"This is a clear movement and evolution of traditional spammers toward targeting mobile technology," Websense Security Labs researcher Elad Sharf said.
It was the first time Websense senior manager of security research Patrik Runald and his team had seen QR codes used in spam.
He said that the culprits may be trying out this tactic to see how people respond, with the goal of eventually evolving it to foist malware.
This article originally appeared at scmagazineus.com
To begin commenting right away, you can log in below or register an account if you don't yet have one. Please read our guidelines on commenting. Offending posts will be removed and your access may be suspended. Abusive or obscene language will not be tolerated. The comments below do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of SC Magazine, Haymarket Media or its employees.