Access member only content, take part in discussions with comments on blogs, news and reviews and receive all the latest security industry news directly to your inbox. Join now for free.
Processing registration... Please wait.
This process can take up to a minute to complete.
A confirmation email has been sent to your email address - SUPPLIED EMAIL HERE. Please click on the link in the email to verify your email address. You need to verify your email before you can start posting.
If you do not receive your confirmation email within the next few minutes, it may be because the email has been captured by a junk mail filter. Please ensure you add the domain @scmagazine.com.au to your white-listed senders.
A US hospital has agreed to settle in court $750,000 (A$769,000) over allegations concerning its failure to protect sensitive patient data.
The consent judgment approved in Suffolk Superior Court involving South Shore Hospital included a $250,000 (A$256,000) civil penalty and a payment of $225,000 (A$231,000) to be used by the AG's office to create awareness concerning data security and sensitive information.
The hospital was credited $275,000 (A$282,000) “to reflect security measures it has taken subsequent to the breach.”
In February 2010, three boxes containing 473 unencrypted tapes with the personal and confidential information of 800,000 people, was shipped by South Shore Hospital to data management contractor Archive Data Solutions, which was to erase the information, then resell the tapes, the statement said.
In June 2010, the hospital learned that only one of the boxes had arrived.
Among the information included on the back-up tapes were Social Security numbers, addresses, phone numbers, birth dates, health plan information, in addition to diagnoses and treatments.
The statement revealed that the hospital not only failed to notify Archive Data Solutions of the sensitive information stored on the files, but did not establish if the contractor had the proper security measures in place to protect the information, thus violating the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).
"We appreciate that the Attorney General has recognised the steps we've taken to enhance our data-security systems and hope to be able to serve as a source of information about best practices for other health care providers,” said Richard H. Aubut, South Shore Hospital president and chief executive officer.
Data security law enforcement has been on the rise and fines have been prevalent, as is the case with a recent settlement involving BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee.
This article originally appeared at scmagazineus.com
To begin commenting right away, you can log in below or register an account if you don't yet have one. Please read our guidelines on commenting. Offending posts will be removed and your access may be suspended. Abusive or obscene language will not be tolerated. The comments below do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of SC Magazine, Haymarket Media or its employees.