Access member only content, take part in discussions with comments on blogs, news and reviews and receive all the latest security industry news directly to your inbox. Join now for free.
Processing registration... Please wait.
This process can take up to a minute to complete.
A confirmation email has been sent to your email address - SUPPLIED EMAIL HERE. Please click on the link in the email to verify your email address. You need to verify your email before you can start posting.
If you do not receive your confirmation email within the next few minutes, it may be because the email has been captured by a junk mail filter. Please ensure you add the domain @scmagazine.com.au to your white-listed senders.
The Federal Government’s controversial data retention scheme has reportedly been stalled until after the next election.
Fairfax cited intelligence sources saying the government had no appetite for “anything that attracts controversy” and would push back consideration of the surveillance scheme.
The scheme, which would require telcos to collect and keep internet and telecommunications activity data for users for two years, was part of a proposal for wide-ranging reform of security and intelligence powers.
First brought up behind closed doors with telcos as early as two years ago, Attorney-General Nicola Roxon referred the issue to a parliamentary committee to consider in May.
A spokesperson for Roxon's office could not be contacted at time of writing.
However, Roxon had publicly expressed doubts about the data retention scheme and reportedly rejected the legislative package developed under former Attorney-General Robert McClelland.
Senior intelligence officials, including the head of the Australian Secret Intelligence Service, have claimed the reforms were “urgently needed”.
Federal Police said they needed the increased surveillance powers to keep track of people's communications activities and to commence investigations in the first place.
Other powers sought included the ability to monitor communications using cloud services and social networks.
Under the proposed legislation, it would be an offence for companies not to decrypt the information.
Germany, which saw a similar proposal, has outlawed data retention regulations as an invasion of privacy.
To begin commenting right away, you can log in below or register an account if you don't yet have one. Please read our guidelines on commenting. Offending posts will be removed and your access may be suspended. Abusive or obscene language will not be tolerated. The comments below do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of SC Magazine, Haymarket Media or its employees.