Access member only content, take part in discussions with comments on blogs, news and reviews and receive all the latest security industry news directly to your inbox. Join now for free.
A confirmation email has been sent to your email address - SUPPLIED EMAIL HERE. Please click on the link in the email to verify your email address. You need to verify your email before you can start posting.
If you do not receive your confirmation email within the next few minutes, it may be because the email has been captured by a junk mail filter. Please ensure you add the domain @scmagazine.com.au to your white-listed senders.
One claim, filed in April 2003, accuses Mayfield and PostX of conspiring to restrain trade by filing unfounded patent claims against Sigaba to slow Sigaba's market growth. The other claim makes similar allegations against PostX alone.
PostX filed patent infringement claims against Sigaba in September 2002. Sigaba officials said the company was cleared of any wrongdoing last November by the Federal Appeals Court in Washington, D.C., which unanimously upheld a decision by the federal court in San Francisco that a trial was unnecessary in the case.
"We're moving forward with our counterclaims to resolve any damage done to Sigaba by those meritless claims and erase any confusion caused by these bogus suits," Robert Cook, Sigaba executive chairman said in a statement.
A spokesperson for PostX said the company cannot comment on pending legal matters.
www.sigaba.com
To begin commenting right away, you can log in below or register an account if you don't yet have one. Please read our guidelines on commenting. Offending posts will be removed and your access may be suspended. Abusive or obscene language will not be tolerated. The comments below do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of SC Magazine, Haymarket Media or its employees.